|
TUES 6 Nov 2007
Good evening Mr Mayor, councillors, ladies & gentlemen...
I will not be sitting with you tonight because last Friday, 2 Nov, at approx
3.30pm the Standards Committee of NDDC, acting for the Standards Board for
England, suspended me from acting as a town councillor for six weeks - until 14
Dec. This was as a result of 15 complaints brought against me by Cllr Dibben
alleging that I had breached the councillors code of conduct that we have all
had to sign. Eight of the allegations were dismissed as groundless - but seven
were upheld and hence the position I find myself in today.
I do not intend to go into the details of those complaints because a public
notice about it all is to be posted in the local press next week if not this,
and a reporter from the Western Gazette was present at the hearing, in Blandford,
and so no doubt you will all be able to read about it on Thursday. If I have
anything further to say it will be after the public notice is published.
The latest complaints bring the total of complaints against me by past and
present members of this council to 27 since the code of conduct was made
compulsory for all councillors in November 2001 - that is, nearly 5 a year. I
gather this is by no means a national record but it is close.
I wish to make a brief comment about the system that has produced this
unhappy state of affairs, a system that I believe to be deeply flawed and
counter to all that used to be good about British democracy, but first I would
like to say that the present situation is particularly ironic, if not even
tragic, in that Cllr Dibben and I, who have 'enjoyed' many differences over the
years, had agreed to enter into a conciliation process to try and overcome these
differences for the wider benefit of the people and community of Shaftesbury as
a whole. That conciliation is being arranged and paid for by NDDC, the very body
whose Standards Committee has now come close to estranging us once again.
I wish to make it clear that I have no intention of letting it do so and
hereby affirm my intention of continuing with the process, if circumstances will
permit. This will not be easy because Cllr Dibben is himself the subject of a
complaint from me to be heard by the same Standards Committee next month
(December). Nevertheless I intend to try because I think the people of
Shaftesbury would expect it of us, and they certainly deserve us to.
And so, a final comment about the system that has produced this state of
affairs: The code of conduct was introduced by a Labour government concerned at
perceived corruption in large inner city councils whose members were and are
effectively fulltime professional politicians paid substantial allowances for
their time and effort. This is not the case in rural areas like Dorset, and it
is even less so in small town and parish councils like Shaftesbury. Here, and I
believe in Dorset as a whole, the code that was introduced was not only a
sledge-hammer to crack a nut but also has actually begun to destroy the
principles of self-regulated honesty and trust in small communities on which
British democracy has successfully relied for centuries by turning member
against member in a way that I find despicable and contemptible. It has been
described as a 'snoops charter' and it is exactly that. But it is worse than
that: it provides a licence for the mean, petty, vindictive, vexatious, and
malicious to wage vendettas against people they dont like or disagree with and
who dare to challenge them. It so frightens some existing members that they no
longer dare speak their minds as once they would. And it so frightens off some
people from wanting to stand for their local council that local democracy itself
is threatened. In short it does nothing but bring local government, local
councils and ultimately democracy into disrepute. It is therefore the Standards
Board for England that should be in the dock, not volunteer members of councils
trying to do their best against mounting odds and rising tides of public apathy
and cynicism - negative forces that in my opinion the code of conduct ironically
reinforces rather than removes.
To my mind I have [done] nothing wrong other than to try to represent the
best interests of the people of Shaftesbury without fear or favour, no matter
who they are. And I am therefore bound now to ask how many more volunteers'
reputations have to be dragged unjustly through the mud, and at what obscene
cost to the taxpayer, before our national politicians see sense and abandon this
counter-productive and utterly wasteful piece of Stalinist legislation?
Richard Thomas Shaftesbury
6 November 2007
|